Simultaneous Spectrophotometric Estimation of Ofloxacin and Satranidazole in Tablet Dosage Form
Wankhede SB*, Prakash A and Chitlange SS
Pad. Dr. D. Y. Patil Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Research, Sant Tukaram Nagar, Pimpri, Pune-18.
*Corresponding Author E-mail: sagar2277@rediffmail.com
ABSTRACT
Two accurate, precise, rapid and economical methods were developed for the estimation of Ofloxacin and Satranidazole in tablet dosage form. First method is first order derivative spectroscopy, wavelengths selected for quantitation were 259.0 nm for Ofloxacin (zero cross for Satranidazole) and 227.0 nm for Satranidazole (zero cross for Ofloxacin). Second method is area under curve method; area under curve in the range of 292.5-282.5 nm (for Ofloxacin) and 325.0-315.0 nm (for Satranidazole) were selected for the analysis. In both the methods linearity for detector response was observed in the concentration range of 5-40 µg/ml for Ofloxacin and Satranidazole, both. The proposed methods were successfully applied for the simultaneous determination of both drugs in commercial tablet preparation. The results of the analysis have been validated statistically and by recovery studies.
KEY WORDS Ofloxacin; Satranidazole; derivative spectroscopy; area under curve method.
INTRODUCTION:
Ofloxacin (OFL) is a fluoroquinolone derivative. Chemically, it is (±)-9-fluoro-2, 3-dihydro-3-methyl-10- (4-methyl-1-piperazinyl)-7-oxo-7H-pyrido-[1,2,3-de]-
1,4-benzoxazine -6-carboxylic acid.1 It is mainly used as antibacterial for the treatment of urinary tract infection and sexually transmitted diseases.
Satranidazole (SAT), is a novel nitroimidazole
derivative. Chemically, it is 1-methylsulfonyl-3-(1- methyl-5-nitro-2-imidazolyl)-2-imidazolidinone2. It is used as antiprotozoal and antibacterial agent in the treatment of amoebiasis3. Ofloxacin is official in USP4 and BP5 whereas Satranidazole is not official in any pharmacopoeia. Both the drugs are marketed as combined dose tablet formulation and the ratio is
200:300 mg OFL: SAT. Literature survey revealed that a number of methods have been reported for estimation of Ofloxacin individually or in combination with other drugs6-12 and Satranidazole is estimated individually13-15. However, there are two analytical methods: simultaneous equation and absorption ratio method16, reported for the simultaneous estimation of Ofloxacin and Satranidazole in a combined dosage formulation. Present work describes two simple, accurate, reproducible, rapid and economical methods for simultaneous estimation of OFL and SAT in tablet formulation.
MATERIAL AND METHODS:
Instrument: A double-beam Shimadzu UV- Visible spectrophotometer, 1700 Pharmaspec, with spectral bandwidth of 2 nm, wavelength accuracy ± 0.5 nm and a pair of 1-cm matched quartz cells was used to measure absorbance of the resulting solution.
Materials: Standard gift sample of Ofloxacin and Satranidazole were provided by Alkem Laboratories Limited, Baddi. Combined dose Ofloxacin and Satranidazole tablets (SATROGYL-O, 200 mg Ofloxacin and 300 mg Satranidazole; manufacture by Alkem Laboratories Limited, Baddi), were purchased from local market.
Solvent used: Double distilled water was used as a solvent. Stock solution: Standard stock solutions of OFL (100 µg/ml) and SAT (100 µg/ml) were prepared and used for the analysis.
Procedure
Method A- First Order Derivative Spectroscopy
In this method solutions of OFL and SAT (25 µg/ml, each), were prepared separately by appropriate dilution of standard stock solution and scanned in the spectrum mode from 400 nm to 200 nm. The absorption spectra thus obtained were derivatized from first to fourth order. First order derivative spectra were selected for analysis of both drugs. From the overlain spectra of both drugs (Fig. 1), wavelength selected for quantitation were 259.0 nm for OFL (zero cross for SAT) and 227.0 nm for SAT (zero cross for OFL). The calibration
Table No. 1: Results of Analysis of Tablet Formulation
|
Method |
Drug |
Label Claim |
Amount of drug estimated (mg/tab) |
% Label Claim* ± S.D. |
% Recovery* |
|
A |
OFL |
200 |
198.80 |
99.41 ± 0.4883 |
99.58 |
|
SAT |
300 |
298.31 |
99.44 ± 0.3802 |
99.61 |
|
|
B |
OFL |
200 |
198.04 |
99.02 ± 0.5318 |
99.74 |
|
SAT |
300 |
298.11 |
99.37 ± 0.7166 |
100.01 |
* indicates mean of six determinations.
curves for OFL and SAT were plotted in the concentration range of 5-40 µg/ml at wavelength 259.0 nm and 227.0 nm, respectively. The concentration of the individual drug present in the mixture was determined against the calibration curve in quantitation mode.
Fig.-1: Overlain Spectra of Ofloxacin (OFL) and
Satranidazole (SAT) in Method- A
Method B- Area Under Curve Method
For the selection of analytical wavelength, solutions of OFL and SAT (25 µg/ml, each), were prepared separately by appropriate dilution of standard stock solution and scanned in the spectrum mode from 400 nm to 200 nm. From the overlain spectra of both drugs (Fig. 1), area under the curve in the range of 292.5-282.5 nm (for OFL) and 325.0-315.0 nm (for SAT) were selected for the analysis. The calibration curves for OFL and SAT were prepared in the concentration range of 5-
40 µg/ml at their respective AUC range. The ‘X’ values of the drugs were determined for both the drugs at the selected AUC range. The ‘X’ is the ratio of area under the curve at selected wavelength ranges with the concentration of component in gm/lit. These ‘X’ values were the mean of six independent determinations. A set of two simultaneous equations obtained by using mean
‘X’ values are given below.
A1 = 615.60 COFL +164.21 CSAT -(at λ292.5-282.5 nm)-- (1) A2 = 268.78 COFL+ 302.12 CSAT -(at λ325.0-315.0 nm) -- (2)
Where A1 and A2 were area under curve of sample at the wavelength range 292.5-282.5 nm and 325.0-315.0 nm, respectively, 615.60 and 268.78 were ‘X’ values of OFL at wavelength range 292.5-282.5 nm and 325.0-315.0 nm, respectively. Similarly 164.21 and 302.12 were ‘X’ values of SAT at the wavelength range 292.5-282.5 nm and 325.0-315.0 nm, respectively. COFL and CSAT were concentration of OFL and SAT, respectively. The
concentration of OFL and SAT in sample was determined by using the equation (1) and (2).
Application of the proposed method for the determination of OFL and SAT in tablets
For the estimation of drugs in the commercial formulations, twenty tablets were weighed and average weight was calculated. The tablets were crushed to obtain fine powder. Tablet powder equivalent to 50 mg OFL was transferred to
100.0 ml volumetric flask and volume made up to the mark with double distilled water and ultrasonicated for 20 minutes. The solution was then filtered through a Whatmann filter paper (No. 41). From the filtrate 5.0 ml was transferred to a
100.0 ml volumetric flask and diluted to the mark with the same solvent. The solution was further diluted with double distilled water to obtain 10 µg/ml OFL and 15 µg/ml of SAT. In Method-A, the concentration of both OFL and SAT were determined by measuring the absorbance of the sample at
259.0 nm and 227.0 nm in first order spectrum mode. The results of the tablet analysis were calculated against the calibration curve in quantitation mode. For Method-B, the concentration of both OFL and SAT were determined by measuring area under curve in the range of 292.5-282.5 nm (for OFL) and 325.0-315.0 nm (for SAT) and values were substituted in the respective formula to obtain concentrations. Results of tablet analysis are shown in Table No. 1.
Fig.-2: Overlain Spectra of Ofloxacin (OFL) and Satranidazole
(SAT) in Method- B
VALIDATION:
The methods were validated with respect to linearity, accuracy, precision and selectivity.
Accuracy: To ascertain the accuracy of the proposed methods, recovery studies were carried out by standard addition method at three different levels (80%, 100% &
120%). Percent recovery for OFL and SAT, by both the methods, was found in the range of 98.74 % to 100.95 %. Linearity: The linearity of measurement was evaluated by analyzing different concentration of the standard solution of
OFL and SAT. For both the methods, the Beer- Lambert’s concentration range was found to be 5-40
µg/ml for OFL and SAT, both.
Precision: The reproducibility of the proposed method was determined by performing tablet assay at different time intervals (morning, afternoon and evening) on same day (Intra-day assay precision) and on three different days (Inter-day precision). Result of intra-day and inter- day precision is expressed in % RSD. Percent RSD for Intraday assay precision was found to be 0.7023 (for OFL) and 0.5280 (for SAT) in first order derivative spectroscopy method; 0.5439 (for OFL) and 0.0749 (for SAT) in area under curve method. Inter-day assay precision was found to be 0.7429 (for OFL) and 0.6998 (for SAT) in first order derivative spectroscopy method;
0.5849 (for OFL) and 0.6352 (for SAT) in area under the curve method.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION:
The methods discussed in the present work provide a convenient and accurate way for simultaneous analysis of OFL and SAT. In first order derivative spectroscopy, wavelengths selected for quantitation were 259.0 nm for OFL (zero cross for SAT) and 227.0 nm for SAT (zero cross for OFL). In area under curve method, the area under curve in the range of 292.5-282.5 nm (for OFL) and 325.0-315.0 nm (for SAT) were selected for the analysis. In both the methods linearity for detector response was observed in the concentration range of 5-
40 µg/ml for OFL and SAT, both. In method A, concentration of the individual drug present in the mixture was determined against the calibration curve in quantitation mode. In method-B, ‘X’ values were calculated for both the drugs at selected wavelengths and substituted in equations for determining concentration of OFL and SAT in tablet sample solution. Percent label claim for OFL and SAT in tablet analysis, by both the methods, was found in the range of 98.35 % to 100.34
%. Standard deviation and coefficient of variance for six determinations of tablet sample, by both the methods, was found to be less than ± 2.0 indicating the precision of both the methods. Accuracy of proposed methods was ascertained by recovery studies and the results are expressed as % recovery. Percent recovery for OFL and SAT, by both the methods, was found in the range of
98.74 % to 100.95 %., values of standard deviation and coefficient of variation was satisfactorily low indicating the accuracy of both the methods. Based on the results
obtained, it is found that the proposed methods are
accurate, precise, reproducible & economical and can be employed for routine quality control of Ofloxacin and Satranidazole in combined dose tablet formulation.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS:
The authors are very thankful to Dr. Avinash D. Deshpande, Director of Pharmacy, Pad. Dr. D. Y. Patil Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Research, Pimpri, Pune for providing necessary facilities. The authors are also thankful to Alkem Laboratories Limited,
Baddi, for providing gift samples of Ofloxacin and
Satranidazole.
REFERENCES:
1. Sweetman SC. In Martindale, The Complete Drug Reference. London: Pharmaceutical Press, London. 1999; 32nd ed: pp 233.
2. http://sci-toys.com/scichem/jqp016/41841.html.
3. Tripathi KD. Essentials of Medical Pharmacology. Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd, New Delhi. 2004; 5th ed: pp 754.
4. United State Pharmacopoeia. United State Pharmacopoeial Convention, Inc. 2003; 26th ed: pp 1334.
5. British Pharmacopoeia. H. M. Stationary Press, London. 2007; II, pp 1163.
6. Mathur SC, Kumar Y, Murugesan N, Rathode YKS and Sethi PD. Spectrophotometric determination of Ofloxacin in Pharmaceutical formulations. Indian Drugs. 1992; 29: 376-377.
7. Immanuel C and Kumar AKH. Simple and rapid high- performance liquid chromatography method for the determination of Ofloxacin concentrations in plasma and urine. J Chromatogr B Biomed Sci Appl. 2001; 760: 91-95.
8. Panzade PD and Mahadik KR. Simultaneous estimation of Ofloxacin and Tinidazole in tablet dosage form. Indian Drugs. 2001; 38: 368-370.
9. Kasture VS, Bhagat AD and Puro NC. Spectrophotometric method for simultaneous estimation of Ofloxacin and Ornidazole in tablet dosage form. Indian Drugs. 2004; 41: 51- 53.
10. Nagori BP, Shrivastava B, Sharma V and Rajput AS. Spectrophotometric method for simultaneous estimation of Ofloxacin and Ornidazole in tablet dosage form. Indian Drugs. 2006; 43: 676-678.
11. Halkar UP and Ankalkope PB. Reverse phase high performance liquid chromatographic determination of Ofloxacin and Tinidazole in tablets. Indian Drugs. 2000; 37:
585-588.
12. Kamble NS and Venkatachalam A. High performance liquid chromatographic determination of Ornidazole and Ofloxacin in solid dosage form. Indian Drugs. 2005; 42: 723-725.
13. Patel MB, Patel KM, Patel GS, Suhagia BN and Prajapati AM. Development and validation of a stability-indicating HPTLC- densitometric method for Satranidazole. J Liq Chromatogr Rel Technol. 2007; 30: 2459-2471.
14. Natarajan S and Raman B. HPLC determination of Satranidazole in bulk and pharmaceutical dosage forms. Asian J Chem. 2008; 20: 1833-1840.
15. Mruthyunjayaswamy BHM, Patil SMM and Raju SA. Spectrophotometric determination of Satranidazole in bulk drug and formulations. J Indian Chem Soc. 2003; 80: 863-865.
16. Wankhede SB, Nanda RK, Prakash A and Chitlange SS. Simultaneous Spectrophotometric estimation of Ofloxacin and Satranidazole in tablet dosage form. J Pharm Res. 2008; 7: 92-94.
Received on 20.08.2008 Modified on 30.08.2008
Accepted on 10.09.2008 © AJRC All right reserved
Asian J. Research Chem. 1(1): July-Sept. 2008;Page 9-11